The destination for history

How Carole Lombard’s career was almost over before it began

carole_lombard_back_cover

In 1926, budding actress Carole Lombard was still a teenager, trying to work her way through the Hollywood minefield. She had already been employed by Fox, and hoped it would lead to big things.

However, she soon learned that in order to become a star, she would have to do more than just be a pretty face. She later spoke about her first experience: ‘[I got through my first years in Hollywood] without knowing a thing about acting. I merely stood there in front of the camera and did what the director told me, and tried to keep my mind blank so I wouldn’t interfere with his thought transmission. Something seemed to give forth on the screen, but I never knew how it happened. It was all an accident.’

The young woman had always been a regular on the Los Angeles club scene, and her fledgling film career did nothing to deter her from having a good time. However, it almost cost Carole her life one evening during 1926, when she was passenger in a car being driven by her sixteen-year-old friend, Harry Cooper. Details of what happened next remain somewhat sketchy, but one thing is clear: there was a tremendous accident, and when the car windscreen shattered, a piece of glass sliced into Carole’s face, leaving terrible gashes near her eye and on her left cheek.

The damage was not life-threatening but she was taken to hospital and ushered into surgery quickly. The process of stitching up her wounds was lengthy and done without anaesthetic, as the doctor feared it would cause her facial muscles to relax and cause further damage to the area.

Later, Carole sat down with reporter Dorothy Wooldridge, and spoke about what had been happening in her life, around the time of the accident. ‘I was terrible [as an actress for Fox] – worse than that, if possible. At the end of a year they threw me out. They should have done it long before. No girl should start picture work in a leading role. It’s unfair to her and punishment to an audience. Right after Fox let me out, an automobile discharged me too. I came out through the windshield. They took twenty-five stitches in my face and to this day I carry the scars, but they’re barely visible.’

Recuperating at home; Carole tried to come to terms with the loss of her contract as well as the accident. However, instead of wallowing in her downfall, the actress spent some time resting, before turning her mind once again to acting. She immersed herself in self-study; read plays (including Shakespeare); acted out small parts in the privacy of her bedroom, and used every spare moment to better her craft.

In amongst her healing, Carole was also visited by friends who would perch on the side of her bed and tell jokes. Sometimes they cried at the unfairness of the crash cutting her career so short, but Carole told them that they mustn’t worry; that it was all okay. Underneath the bravado, however, she was concerned that if the large scar on her cheek did not heal, her career would most certainly be over. Her prediction was almost proved correct, as by the time she had recovered enough to go back to work, many of the studios had forgotten all about her fledgling career and had no interest in reigniting it.

The upset caused by this lack of concern was upsetting, but in true Lombard fashion, she refused to let it get her down. Instead she vowed to do everything in her power to put the past behind her and move on with the future. Hollywood masseuse Sylvia Ulback recalled, ‘Did she cry and moan about [the scar]? She did not. She didn’t pay any attention to it, but went right on. And because of her attitude I tell you that scar is actually attractive; girls can learn a lot from Carole.’

Still, the knowledge that she would have a scar for the rest of her life was well and truly on Carole’s mind, and the subject would be brought up in articles and interviews many times over the years. During a chat with reporter Elisabeth Goldbeck, the woman told Carole that her face seemed to have changed. She asked if this could be a result of the crash. The actress was quick to defend her looks and jumped into a full explanation:

‘I have pictures taken before and after the accident, which prove that had absolutely nothing to do with it. They were almost identical. The accident happened six years ago, and it’s only in the last three or four years that my face has changed. But it HAS changed completely. I think it changed as I changed mentally. Age changes you, and experience. It hollows your face and alters the mould. Your face can’t help reflecting all that goes on in your mind. All the emotions you feel, all the troubles and heartaches and grief you experience, leave their mark if you’re an actress.’

Carole went through a great deal as she recovered during 1926. ‘My upper lip was so stiff from this accident, that for several months I could hardly move it,’ she told reporter Muriel Babcock. ‘Massage did the trick. It is all right now.’ By autumn she was well enough to re-join her friends at the Coconut Grove nightclub, in order to take part in another dance competition. Under her real name of Jane Peters, she went all the way to the finals, where she competed against several dozen other youngsters, including actresses Joan Crawford and Billie Dove.

In time, Carole’s mental and physical scars from the accident began to fade. However, she decided not to let the matter go completely, and wanted to take the driver of the car and his parents, to court. Judge Fleming of the Superior Court was in charge of the case, but before he was able to assess the damage caused by the crash, the suit was suddenly settled out of court. Carole attempted to keep the payment a secret from reporters, but it was quickly rumoured that she had accepted $3,000 from the family, in return for a promise that she would not pursue the claim further.

This tremendous show of gumption was the beginning of a long battle to gain complete control of her life and career. From now on, Carole would never be anyone’s pushover, and whatever stressful – or sometimes tragic – circumstances were thrown at her; she would always fight her corner and come out on top. She was, in short, a woman of tremendous strength and courage that put her light years ahead of most of her contemporaries. She was without doubt, a Twentieth-Century Star.

By Michelle Morgan

Sign up for our newsletter

show more books